Team Building Exercise

The Effect Team Building Interventions Have on the Corporate Sector 

A dissertation submitted by Ian Harnett in partial completion of the award for BSC (HONS) Sport Development and Coaching Sciences.

Click here for a full list of team building events


Chaper FIVE - Discussion

4) Discussion of After the Event

Question

"In the time since the event, how have the team been affected, what changes have been experienced?"

Click here to view the result of this question

Discussion

In the case of Group 1 who had experienced similar events in the past, the effects of the interventions, although expected, were described as 'perfect'.

With reference to Tuckman's Team Development Theory (1965) the first stage and arguably part of the second stage of development have been completed within one day, this evidence backs up the literature assessed earlier from Carron and Hausenblas (1998), who suggest that when successful, team building creates team synergy which consequently leads to improved team performance.

Precisely the effect this team building intervention has had on Group 1's team. Once the project is complete the team will encounter the, much neglected, fifth stage of Tuckman's Team Development Theory (cited Chapman 2005), the stage responsible for the splitting of the team and sensitively releasing the bonds developed within the group.


Group 2's team experienced the desired goals of the interventions for the initial stages following the event, the effects were said to have worn off within time, this is evidence that the effects of the interventions can be short lived and only temporarily fulfill the objectives.

There is limited literature on the long term effects of team building interventions.

If the study from Buller and Bell (1986) was revisited and the effects observed four months following the team building, the results would determine whether the issue experienced is a common theme.

 Without this evidence no strong comparisons can be made.


The primary aim of this thesis was to identify the relationship between the managers' expectations and the actual effect of team building.

In the case of Group 3 the experienced effects were greater than those expected.

The intentions were to increase productivity and therefore profits. A luxury team building sailing weekend was the chosen intervention.

The manager wanted to stop the downturn in production and reverse it into an increase.

It was thought that to complete these objectives the team needed a reward which involved team challenges, evidence which supports views from Bateman et al. (2002) who mention that organisation and cohesion are the essence of a successful team.

The team has not only stopped the downturn in production but in the six weeks following the event have actually increased production by twelve percent of what it was prior to the intervention.

This increased competence goes on to back up the views held by Adair (1986) who describes an effective team as one that not only achieves its aims efficiently but is ready to take on more challenges if they arise.

In the case of Group 3's team they have shown evidence of striving for higher goals and are an example of these views expressed by Adair (1986).

With the evidence, albeit not followed up in other literature, from Group 2's experience of the initial increase in productivity within the first few weeks before a decline to previous levels in the following two months, the long term effects of Group 3's interventions need to be considered before conclusive evidence is reported.

The reported effects in this intervention are similar to those experienced by Buller and Bell (1986).

This intervention backs up the research hypothesis which states that team building interventions do have a significant positive effect on the effectiveness, efficiency, morale or productivity within major blue-chip companies.


Looking at broader reasons as to why the effects have been so positive, evident from Maslow's hierarchy of needs (1954 cited Weightman 1999), it could be argued that the workers have moved from levels one and two, physiological and safety needs respectively, to level three, social needs.

Maslow (1954 cited Weightman 1999) uses the description that individuals are constantly striving to reach the next level of the hierarchy.

This description is similar to that of Adair (1986) who similarly defines a successful team as one that strives to achieve more challenges.

This is a view that managers wish to install within their teams and in this case is what has evidently happened.

This is the reason that senior directors within the company are keen to provide team building to all of its departments.


Group 4 participated in a fun team building event that was intended to lift low morale and eradicate negativity within the sales team.

This type of activity is illustrated by Buller (1986, cited in Salas et al. 1999 p311), who describes team building as a means of intervention facilitated by a third party consultant who develops the problem solving capacity and solves major problems of an intact work group.

The major problem mentioned is the disruption within the group due to new targets, before this team can focus on enhancing organizational effectiveness they have to stop the problems currently experienced, a view supported by Woodman and Sherwood (1980). The team building interventions did this.


Group 5 reported that the team building interventions have had some negative effects on their team.

The Belbin facilitated event has caused some disruption and conflict within the group.

This supports the literature from Likert (1961) and Wisner and Feist (2001) who believe that team building can do some harm in certain cases.

The event selection has a role to play in the negative effects experienced, it is stated by Belbin (2004) himself that this theory of team building is most suitable for new teams and not existing teams who will not foresee changes after the interventions.

 

Event Categories

 

 

Outdoor
28 Events

Event Sumary Image One

category link
Indoor
30 Events

Event Sumary Image Two

category link
Charity
5 Events

Event Sumary Image Three

category link
Icebreaker
11 Events

Event Sumary Image Four

category link
Summer
13 Events

Event Sumary Image Five

category link

98%

5 star reviews

1,000+

Events annually

36

Years, Est. 1988

100%

Fun Guaranteed

Porsche Logo
PWC Logo
RAC Logo
Red Bull Logo
Salvation Army Logo
Sega Logo
Shell Logo
Sony Logo
Specsavers Logo
Tesco Logo
Unilever Logo
Virgin Logo
Which Logo
AA Logo
Airbus Logo
Amazon Logo
Aztrazeneca Logo
BBC Logo
British Red Cross Logo
Bupa Logo
Cadbury Logo
Coco-Cola Logo
DHL Logo
Dominos Logo
Dyson Logo
Estee Lauder Logo
Hilton Logo
Honda Logo
HP Logo
ITV Logo
JCB Logo
KPMG Logo
London School of Economics Logo
Loreal Logo
National Grid Logo
Nestle Logo
NFU Mutual Logo
NHS Logo
Nike Logo

OUR STORY

35 years of professional event management

Establishing in 1988, we've grown into a national leader in corporate team building activities. We deliver spectacular events at locations and venues across the country. Our client list includes leading companies from every market sector down to the smallest family business.

OUR TOP EVENTS

Something for everyone

Highly Rated
5 - 120
2-3 Hours

Chocolate Making

Go through every delicious stage of Chocolate making and design.

Event Detail Link
10 - 500
1 hour

Haka Workshop

A spine-tingling icebreaker activity featuring Maori tribesmen all the way from NZ!

Event Detail Link
5 - 200
2-6 hours

Country Sports

Dust out the office cobwebs with our selection of outdoor team building country sports activities.

Event Detail Link
8-120
Approx. 4 hours

The Parmesan Job

Fiats for each team, an engaging script, thrilling challenges. An epic adventure!

Event Detail Link
10 - 200
1 - 3 hours

Ultimate Challenge

Hundreds of varied challenges to complete in the allotted time.

Event Detail Link
10 - 250
2 -4 hours

iPad Movie Making

Lights, Camera, Action! Create a sketch, movie scene or TV advert with your team.

Event Detail Link
10-250
2-4 hours

Hidden Quest Treasure Hunt Event

A fun, challenging bespoke treasure hunt, all guided by our iPad Mini's.

Event Detail Link
Featured
5-200
3-6 hours

Rib Treasure Hunt

Speed across the Solent at speeds of up to 50mph.

Event Detail Link
10 - 500
1 hour

Boombastic

These simple plastic musical tubes can change any conference or meeting room into a sea of colour in this fun icebreaker activity.

Event Detail Link